END TIMES PROPHECY NEWS UPDATE, CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS POLITICAL NEWSLETTER webcast and youtube vide

END TIMES PROPHECY NEWS UPDATE, CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS POLITICAL NEWSLETTER webcast and youtube vide
CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS WEBCAST ON YOUTUBE PLAYLIST AND GOOGLE+
Showing posts with label gay marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gay marriage. Show all posts

Saturday, June 27, 2015

FEDERAL CHRISTIAN CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS TRUMP STATE ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAWS! FEDERAL TRUMPS STATE!

HATE SPEECH LAWS WERE OVERTURNED IN THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT, Upholding Our Legal Right To Debate The Issues, Citing Homosexuality And Islam Specifically, And Any Issue Can Be Debated From A Biblical View!

The Legal Right To Adhere To Biblical Core Values, citing specifically Romans chapter 1, and scriptures condemning homosexuality, were upheld in the Federal Supreme Court.

Federal laws protecting Christian civil rights trump state antidiscrimination laws, as federal law trumps state.

Carrie Geren Scoggins,
End Times Prophecy News Update,


Friday, June 26, 2015

GAY MARRIAGE ON A FEDERL LEVEL

My statements about today's ruling making gay marriage legal on a federal level, besides hoping our state supreme court was accurate when stating today, that this violates state's rights laws and mandates, hoping to undo forcing this state, and others, to accept this, would be to say that.
1)  All sin is not weighed equally in scripture, some were "weightier sins of the law," such as certain types of blaspheming being unpardonable, witchcraft practitioners condemned to the "lower parts of hell," and then that of homosexuality being the only sin in scripture noted for being the end result of having left God, then going over into other religions. The process of having been given over to a reprobate mind, laid out in chronological order.
HOMOSEXUALITY IS THE ONLY SIN, THAT THE BIBLE STATES IS THE END RESULT OF HAVING LEFT GOD, THEN GOING OVER INTO OTHER RELIGIONS, Romans chap. 1, as explained in the photo below:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2) The story of the twin cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were set as an example for future generations that fell into this same Godless sin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3) Judgment fell upon Sodom and Gomorrah, when the judges voted to legalize acts of homosexuality, very similar to the United States having judges legalize this same sin, as noted in the book of Genesis, ch 19, describing their destruction.
According to 2 Peter 2:6+7 is stating Sodom and Gomorrah is an example for all generation that commit these abominations from there after, meaning God will destroy the nations taking Sodom and Gomorrah's path, and we see this is so when looking at other cultures having done so such as Pompeii.
Carrie Geren Scoggins,
End Times Prophecy News Update,
Webcast on YouTube
 
MY LETTER TO A HOMOSEXAL USING OLD TESTAMENT LAWS SUCH AS NOT MIXING FABRICS, AND NOT EATING SHELL FISH IN HOPES OF DISCREDITING THE BIBLE:
Reply to James at post 279,
note it is understandable that God wanted certain clothes not to be worn at certain times, as a word of Wisdom, such as in that era there were 3 clothing items were to be worn by lepers only, and warning not to wear these items into the desert, just as if God warned his minister going into certain areas not to wear gang colors.
Secondly the shell fish not being eaten was a true world of Wisdom, as it carries many virus such as flesh eating virus, of which even today kills 1 in 4 that contract it, and it is usually being cut by raw shell fish or crab, and the wound is infected with this highly contagious disease.

Mocking what you do not understand does not make you look intelligent, nor accurate.
Also, Jesus did mention all of God's laws, which includes homosexuality, when He stated "I did not come to change the law."
Romans however does go further into detail to quote why one is given over to a reprobate mind, in chronological order, step 1, they knew who God was and refused to serve Him as God, Romans 1:21, then step 2), they leave the God of the Bible going over into other religions worshiping the creation rather than the creator, Romans 1:24, and 3) then God gave them over to a reprobate mind where man lay with man as should be with a woman, Romans 1:28 and so forth.
Getting deliverance is to undo the said process of having been given over to a reprobate mind by going back and repenting for each step, the having known God and then leaving them, then going over into other religions, asking God to show you what to repent for.
This indeed is not about judging an individual, however, we can no compromise scripture to accommodate people's sin nature, when what they need is deliverance, and to be done in a quite way without making a spectacle of those in need of this.
It is hate the sin, but love the sinner,
End Times Prophecy News Update,
Carrie Geren Scoggins,
YouTube webcast
 
 

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

BILL HASLAM IS WRONG, A FEDERAL JUDGE CAN NOT OVERTURN THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT RULING GIVING THE DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE INTO THE INDIVIDUAL STATE'S HANDS.

BILL HASLAM IS WRONG, A FEDERAL JUDGE CAN NOT OVERTURN THE STATE'S LAWS AGAINST GAY MARRIAGE. FEDERAL JUDGES DO NOT HAVE THE POWER TO OVERTURN THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT RULING GIVING THE STATES THE LEGAL RIGHT TO "DEFINE" MARRIAGE:

BILL HALSAM STATED
"Tennessee actually put that to a vote," he said. "Until a judge rules that law is unconstitutional or until there's a different vote, our obligation is to enforce the law. That's what the people of Tennessee and the legislature voted for."  

Bill Haslam is wrong in thinking that a federal judge can overturn the state's laws, the Federal Supreme Court ruled it is left up to the states to determine the definition of marriage in their state, a federal judge does NOT have the power to overturn a Federal Supreme Court ruling.  The state attorney generals' offices would strike down the federal judge's attempt at this, as it is not the legal.                                                           

Carrie Geren Scoggins

Christian Civil Rights News Center, by Carrie Geren Scoggins


Wednesday, March 5, 2014

POPE MAY CHOOSE TO TEAR ROMANS CHAP 1 OUT OF THE BIBLE, GO ALONG WITH THE END TIMES BEAST SYSTEM'S CHURCH OF THE "LUKE WARM," BY LETTING IN SOME SAME SEX UNION.

THIS POPE GOING AGAINST THE BIBLE, ROMANS 
CHAP 1, SHOULD CAUSE A SPLIT IN THE CATHOLIC 
CHURCH, AS THE REAL BIBLE BELIEVERS WILL NOT 
TOLERATE THIS NON CHRISTIAN MAN MADE 
THEOLOGY IN THE CHURCH. THIS IS BRINGING IN 
THE LAST DAYS "CHURCH OF LAODICEA," OR THE 
CHURCH OF THE "LUKE WARM."
IT IS NOT CHRISTIAN UNLESS IT IS BY THE BOOK, 
THE BIBLE!
THE POPE CAN NOT TEAR OUT ROMANS CHAP 1, 
"TAKING AWAY FROM" THE WORD OF GOD. THE 
BOOK OF REVELATIONS STATES THAT THOSE WHO 
ADD UNTO THE WORD OF GOD, OR TAKE AWAY FROM 
THE WORD OF GOD, WILL HAVE THE CURSES OF THE 
BOOK ADDED UNTO THEM. 

THIS SCRIPTURE GOD 

SPECIFICALLY PUT IN THE 
BOOK DESCRIBING THE LAST DAYS, AS "IN THE LAST 
DAYS THEY WILL NOT ENDURE SOUND DOCTRINE." 
AND IN THE LAST DAYS WOULD BE THE TIME WHEN 
MANY WOULD WANT TO TEAR PAGES OUT OF THE 
BIBLE, OR ADD IN PARTS, THAT GOD WAS NOT THE 
AUTHOR OF. 
TEARING ROMANS CHAP 1, CALLING 
HOMOSEXUALITY BEING GIVEN OVER TO A 
REPROBATE MIND, DUE TO HAVING KNOWN GOD 
AND THEN LEFT HIM, GOING OVER INTO OTHER 
RELIGIONS, THEN GOD GAVE THEM OVER TO A 
REPROBATE MIND, CAN NOT BE "TAKEN AWAY 
FROM" THE BIBLE. 
"THEY KNEW WHO GOD WAS, AND REFUSED TO 
SERVE HIM AS GOD," THEN WENT OVER AND 
"WORSHIPED THE CREATION RATHER THAN THE 
CREATOR," GOING INTO OTHER RELIGIONS, EVEN 
AFTER HAVING KNOWN GOD AND LEAVING HIM, 
THEN GOD "GAVE THEM OVER TO A REPROBATE 
MIND," WHERE "MAN LAY WITH MAN,

 AS SHOULD BE WITH A WOMAN."
THE POPE CAN NOT ADD TO, NOR TAKE AWAY FROM, 
THE WORD OF GOD. THE WORD OF GOD, SUCH AS 
ROMANS CHAP 1, BY JUST TEARING THAT 
SCRIPTURE OUT, OR "RE INTERPRETING IT," SO AS 
TO MAKE IT INTO A DIFFERENT MEANING.

CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS POLITICAL NEWSLETTER 
BIBLE PROPHECY TIMES EDITION

Sunday, December 15, 2013

MR. ALAN WEST, HIGHLY RESPECTED MAN IN POLITICS AND MILITARY LEADER, AND I AGREE ON LIBERAL HYPOCRISY. DEMOCRATS CLAIM TO SUPPORT WOMEN'S RIGHTS, GAY MARRIAGE, AND YET STEP OUT TO DEFEND SHARIA LAW WITH ALL IT'S CIVIL RIGHT VIOLATIONS.

[ADDING TO MR. ALAN B. WEST'S INTELLIGENT DEBATE WITH LIBERAL HYPOCRISY]

MR. ALAN WEST SEES THE LIBERAL HYPOCRISY AS DO I, and neither of us are shocked at their typical Democrat double standards. It is standard Democrat liberal lame stream to hate Christians over the gay marriage debates, and hate Republican religious right Christians over all Democrat white elephants such as gay marriage/ abortion issues / porn "rights", and their socialism where those that work a job pay for those that do not... as the Christians and Republicans do not support Democrats in this, nor do they support Democrats wanting to bring in religious censorship on homosexuality, wanting to censor the Bible as hate speech on scriptures pertaining to homosexuality, as Democrats were so shocked to see these hate speech laws now overturned by the Federal Supreme Court... It angered Democrats that Christians had free speech rights, the "legal right to debate the issue," upheld, and that indeed freedom of religion, and congress passing no law impeding religion meant keeping the state [big government Democrat collectivists boards and bureaus ] out of our churches and their doctrines! Oh at how they want freedom of speech for those supporting their agenda, and not freedom straight across the board to ensure the legal rights of those that oppose them, even to the point they wanted to overturn the constitutional freedom of religion and freedom of speech, calling the constitution an "out dated document," as it gave legal rights to citizens to oppose their viewpoint. Indeed their support of Islam, knowing all the loss of all civil rights under Islamic Sharia law, is just another of the items on the list of Democrat hypocrisies. When they act as though Christians and Republicans do not support civil rights or freedoms, we indeed have much cannon fodder to use against them in returning fire, as they do not support anyone having civil rights but those that they choose to support. At least we support freedom straight across the board, rather than their one sided agenda. When it comes to not supporting personal individual freedoms, the Democrats need to get the giant plank out of their own eye before they set out to get the tiny speck out of the Republican party's eye!