GOOGLE FORCED TO REMOVE VIDEO ON ISLAM VIOLATED THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT OF THE "LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE THE ISSUE," AFFECTING CHRISTIAN COUNTER CULT MINISTRIES. WE HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE ISLAM WITHOUT CENSORSHIP BY FEDERAL SUPREME COURT RULING!

http://youtu.be/XjqQZs3hDs8



CENSORSHIP OF RELIGIOUS DEBATE, AND LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE ISLAM:



GOOGLE WAS FORCED BY THE  COURT SYSTEM TO REMOVE A VIDEO THAT WAS CRITICAL OF ISLAM, THE VIDEO "INNOCENCE OF MUSLIMS," VIOLATING THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT RULING SUPPORTING OUR "LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUE," OVERTURNING THE HATE SPEECH LAWS. 



Story from: www.Israelnation.com



GOOGLE BEING FORCED BY THE COURTS TO REMOVE A VIDEO CRITICAL OF ISLAM VIOLATES THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT GIVING US THE "LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUE," ON ANY TOPIC!THE "HATE SPEECH" LAWS, CENSORING 



THE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS OF THOSE THAT WANT TO DEBATE ISLAM, WERE DEEMED 

UNCONSTITUTIONAL RELIGIOUS CENSORSHIP BY THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL SUPREME COURT.  THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT OVERTURNED THE 

HATE SPEECH LAWS, UPHOLDING OUR "LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUE."



CHRISTIANS HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE ANY ISSUE, OR DEBATE ANY OTHER RELIGIONS, AS THERE ARE NO LAWS CENSORING RELIGIOUS DEBATE IN THE UNITED STATES.



THE HATE SPEECH LAWS WERE OVERTURNED, AND OUR LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUES, WERE UPHELD. 



THIS ENSURES THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF RELIGIOUS DEBATE, AMONG THE RELIGIOUS GROUPS, TO ARGUE, DISAGREE, AND DEBATE, OVER OTHER RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND DOCTRINES. 



THERE IS NO FREEDOM FROM RELIGION IN THE UNITED STATES, NOR IS THERE A FREEDOM FROM RELIGIOUS DEBATE, AS WE ARE TO PRACTICE TOLERANCE OF OTHER PEOPLE'S VIEWPOINTS THAT OPPOSE OUR OWN.





HAVING THE "LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE THE ISSUE," MEANS CHRISTIANS HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE ISLAM, AND ISLAMIC GROUPS HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE CHRISTIANS. THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS CENSORSHIP, NOR CENSORSHIP OF RELIGIOUS DEBATE, IN THE UNITED STATES. 



FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS A RADICAL IDEA, AS IT MEANS ARGUING, DISAGREEING, AND DEBATE ARE FULLY LEGAL, AND THAT MANY WILL HEAR THINGS THAT THEY ARE OFFENDED BY.  THIS IS WHAT FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS ALL ABOUT, AS IT OPPOSES CENSORSHIP. 



IT IS FREEDOM STRAIGHT ACROSS THE BOARD, FOR ANY VIEWPOINT, TO BE EXPRESSED. THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS GIVES THE MEDIA THE LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE ANY ISSUE AS WELL.



THE OLD ADAGES: 



"YOU ARE NOT A LIBERTARIAN UNTIL YOU SUPPORT THE LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU DESPISE." 



"I MAY DISAGREE WITH WHAT YOUR SAYING, BUT I WOULD GIVE MY LIFE FOR YOUR FREEDOMS TO SAY IT,"



ARE WHAT OUR NATION'S FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS FOUNDED UPON. FREEDOM OF SPEECH, STRAIGHT ACROSS THE BOARD, FOR EVERY VIEWPOINT, WITHOUT ANY FORM OF CENSORSHIP. 





THE UNITED STATES' "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE,"KEEPS THE STATE OUT OF THE RELIGIOUS GROUPS, OUT OF THE CHURCH, STOPPING ANY FORM OF RELIGIOUS CENSORSHIP, AND STOPS CENSORSHIP OF RELIGIOUS DEBATE.

THE UNITED STATES DOES NOT HAVE ANTI BLASPHEMING LAWS, AS IT IS A FORM OF RELIGIOUS CENSORSHIP, WHICH WOULD CENSOR RELIGIOUS DEBATE.



SHARIA LAW, ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS LAWS, ARE NOT COMPATIBLE WITH OUR UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH, AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION, AS SHARIA LAW WOULD EXECUTE ANYONE SPEAKING AGAINST ISLAM. 



OUR UNITED STATES IS NOT AN ISLAMIC THEOCRACY, AS WE HAVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, THE LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE ANY ISSUE INCLUDING ISLAM, AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION, LEAVING THE CHOICE OF WHICH RELIGION ONE WISHES TO FOLLOW IS LEFT UP TO THE INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN TO DECIDE. 



FOR THOSE THAT ARE OFFENDED BY OTHERS VOICING THEIR OPINIONS ABOUT RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, TOLERANCE IS EXPECTED. TOLERANCE FOR THE VARYING VIEWPOINTS BEING VOICED, AND THE DEBATE AND ARGUING BETWEEN THOSE THAT HOLD DIFFERENT RELIGIOUS FAITHS.



RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE ALLOWS FOR OTHER PEOPLE TO VOICE THEIR RELIGIOUS VIEWPOINTS, AND THE LEGAL RIGHT TO DISAGREE.