FROM BBCTHEFORUM, RAHUL SAGAR AND I DISAGREE ON HOW TO DEAL WITH ILLEGAL ACTIVITY AND CORRUPTION IN GOVERNMENT, SNOWDEN EXPOSED THE ILLEGAL ACTIVITY WHICH CONFORMS TO US LAWS, SO HE WAS NOT AIDING AND ABETTING THE CROOKED NSA OFFICERS, NOR WAS HE AN ACCESSORY TO THE FACT, AS HE WOULD NOT BREAK THE LAW WITH THE CROOKED NSA.

Snowden exposed illegal corruption, that is not a "leak," the word leak was used to cover the butts of the NSA for their law breaking in front of the media, and to 'switch and bait,' take it from NSA's guilt exposed to then turn and accuse Snowden. BY US LAW IF SNOWDEN HAD NOT EXPOSED THE NSA'S ABUSE OF A PUBLIC OFFICE AND HARASSMENT AND CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AGAINST REPUBLICANS AND RELIGIOUS RIGHT [SEP OF CHURCH AND STATE TARGETING CHRISTIANS IN POLITICS], THEN HE WOULD HAVE BROKEN THE LAW WITH THEM AS AN 'ACCESSORY TO THE FACT.' AND WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO BE CHARGED FOR 'AIDING AND EBETTING,' THE NSA OFFICIALS WITH THEIR LAW BREAKING. AS IT STANDS SNOWDEN REFUSED TO BREAK THE LAWS WITH THE NSA CROOKED OFFICES AND EXPOSED THEM INSTEAD! MAKE SURE THE STORY IS TOLD IN THE LIGHT OF THIS TRUTH. THERE WAS NO GRAY AREA, SNOWDEN MADE THE GODLY CHOICE TO NOT VIOLATE THE US LAWS GOING ALONG WITH THE NSA, AND INSTEAD HE EXPOSED THEM. THAT IS NOT A 'LEAK,' THAT IS AN HONEST LAW ABIDING CITIZEN. HE WAS THE ONLY HONEST ONE OUT OF THOSE WORKING WITH THE NSA, ALL THE REST KEPT THEIR MOUTH'S SHUT ABOUT NSA BREAKING THE US LAWS. THIS MAN 'SAGAR,' YOU ARE QUOTING MUST SUPPORT JUST LETTING GOVERNMENT BREAK THE LAWS, AND FOR THEIR EMPLOYEES TO NOT EXPOSE IT, BUT RATHER JUST SAY NOTHING. TOTALITARIAN GOVERNMENTS EVERYWHERE WOULD LOVE HIM, HE IS JUST THE DEMON THEY WANT WORKING FOR THEM! HERE IN THE US WE HAVE A CONSTITUTION, AND EXPECT ALL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT TO ABIDE BY IT, AND IF THE NSA OFFICERS BREAK THESE LAWS, THEN THEY SHOULD BE ARRESTED. THEY ARE NOT ABOVE THE LAW, AND EVERY CITIZEN IS EXPECTED TO EXPOSE CORRUPTION IN GOVERNMENT WHERE THEY FIND IT. OUR LAWS WERE BASED ON THE BIBLICAL LAW, EXPOSE EVIL WHERE YOU FIND IT, AND IF THEY DO NOT THEN THEY ARE AIDING AND ABETTING, ACCESSORY TO THE FACT. AT LEAST SNOWDEN EXPOSED THEM AND DID NOT BREAK THE LAW BY NOT EXPOSING THEM. YOU NEED TO STOP QUOTING SAGAR AND START QUOTING THE BIBLE.

This week on The Forum - to leak or not to leak? Princeton politics professor Rahul Sagar says government whistle-blowers operate mostly in a grey area, and the ‘reveal all’ tactics of Manning and Snowden need to be seriously challenged. If your conscience is troubled and you work in the security services, your first impulse should be to resign, not to leak state secrets to the world’s media. Unless that is, you find evidence of 'gross wrongdoing'. But who decides what that is? #BBCTheForumhttp://bbc.in/bMUE30

YES THE WHITE HOUSE KNEW IT IS ABUSE OF A PUBLIC OFFICE TO USE A GOVERNMENT OFFICE TO GO AFTER THEIR POLITICAL OPPOSITION!

THEY KNEW IT WAS ILLEGAL FOR THE WHITE HOUSE TO USE A PUBLIC GOVT OFFICE TO TARGET POLITICAL OPPOSITION. IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS OF NO EXCUSE, BUT THEY DID KNOW THAT IT WAS ILLEGAL, OR ABUSE OF A PUBLIC OFFICE.

On Fox Business: IRS & WH Share Confidential Taxpayer Info

Did you know the IRS and the White House were sharing confidential taxpayer information? Did you also know it’s illegal to do so?

Watch Charles Payne and I discuss on Fox Business.

Chuck Missler -- Transhumanism http://youtu.be/xkJe9re-8AI WHAT IS COMING DOWN THE PROVERBIAL, 'PIKE,' AT US.

National ID and RFID Chip Implant - Coming Soon To A Nation Near You Par...

http://youtu.be/U1zh5roPmXI

ABORTION IS NOT A "VICTIMLESS CRIME," THEREFORE IT IS NOT A PERSONAL CHOICE DEBATE, IT DOES NOT QUALIFY TO BE A "CHOICE," ISSUE, DUE TO THEIR BEING A VICTIM.

ABORTION IS NOT A VICTIMLESS CRIME, THERE IS A VICTIM. ABORTION CAN NOT BE CONSIDERED A "CHOICE" ISSUE, SINCE THERE IS A VICTIM INVOLVED.

President Obama's abortion-pill mandate violates the religious liberty of millions of Americans. Fight back.

Share and Sign our petition to oppose the President's HHS Mandate and to defend the religious liberty of millions:http://bit.ly/1adVLTq

$2 BILLION DOLLAR NSA SPY BUILDING GOES UP IN FLAMES, THE JUDGMENT OF GOD ON NSA CONTINUES, FIRST GOD EXPOSED THEIR VIOLATING THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE "RELIGIOUS RIGHT," AND THEN CAME THEIR REFUSAL TO REPENT.

IT IS OBVIOUS THAT GOD HAS ALREADY EXPOSED THEM, AND THE JUDGMENT OF GOD CONTINUES ON THEM AS THEY HARASS THE "RELIGIOUS RIGHT," AND VIOLATE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS. GOD WILL CONTINUE TO BRING JUDGMENT ON THEM AND ALL THAT HARASS, BULLY, OR OPPRESS GOD'S PEOPLE. GOD IS NOT GOING TO BLESS THEM FOR THEIR ANTI CHRISTIAN HATE, THAT IS FOR SURE!

$2 Billion NSA Spy Center is Going Up in Flames

www.endtime.com

The National Security Agency's $2 billion mega spy center is going up in flames. Technical glitches have sparked fiery explosions within the NSA's newest and largest data storage facility in Utah, destroying hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of equipment, and delaying the facility's opening by…

"A AND E," DISCRIMINATES AGAINST CHRISTIAN FREE SPEECH, TRYING TO CENSOR WORD "JESUS," ILLEGALLY, FED SUPREME COURT SAID "THERE IS NO FREEDOM FROM RELIGION," IT IS THEIR LEGAL RIGHT TO SPEAK OF THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS WITH CENSORSHIP, NOR ANTI CHRISTIAN BULLYING!

THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE TO SUE "A AND E," FOR ANTI CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION. THE ACLJ, OR LIBERTY COUNSEL, SHOULD FILE SUIT TO DEMAND JUSTICE. THERE IS
"NO FREEDOM FROM RELIGION," WE DO NOT CENSOR PEOPLE OVER RELIGION, THIS IS THE LAW, IT DOES NOT MATTER IF PEOPLE ARE OFFENDED, THAT IS WHAT FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS, THE "LEGAL RIGHT TO DEBATE THE ISSUE," IT IS THE LEGAL RIGHT TO ARGUE AND DISAGREE. IT IS THEIR LEGAL RIGHT TO SAY WHAT THEY FEEL, AND NOT BE CENSORED OVER RELIGION. THAT IS THE LAW. " A AND E," SHOULD BE SUED, AND DEMAND PUNITIVE DAMAGES, AND MAKE SURE THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN TO OTHER ACTORS, BULLIED INTO SILENCE OVER THEIR RELIGION DUE TO CHRISTIAN HATERS TRYING TO ILLEGALLY CENSOR THEM.